call for agenda items

Discussion:

Peter Saint-Andre

2012-10-22 02:08:22 UTC

There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you have
definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to discuss
during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on the kind
of open issues that require WG interaction to move forward), please
post to this list in the next few days so that Chris Weber and I can
generate a draft agenda.

Thanks!

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

Larry Masinter

2012-10-23 00:01:24 UTC

Permalink

Some suggested agenda items:

* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results, and what additional testing is needed. http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this time around, at least briefly.
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: call for agenda items
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you have
definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to discuss
during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on the kind
of open issues that require WG interaction to move forward), please
post to this list in the next few days so that Chris Weber and I can
generate a draft agenda.
Thanks!
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlCEqpYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxclwCgosxu1CYeFHoGQqdNhszAzDG/
es8An3TJaWI9Mb/jzJzadEHvdZSlzWsy
=+47t
-----E

Larry Masinter

2012-10-23 00:37:50 UTC

Permalink

Two more possible topics for IRI WG meeting in Atlanta:

* briefly about registerProtocolHandler in HTML5 and its implication for scheme registration
* about fragment identifiers and I18N (not discussed but alluded to in "Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions" http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.html)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results, and what
additional testing is needed. http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to
update or send corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this time
around, at least briefly.
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with
http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCEqpYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxclwCgosxu1CYeFHoGQqdNhszAzDG/

es8An3TJaWI9Mb/jzJzadEHv

Dave Thaler

2012-10-23 01:25:41 UTC

Permalink

I could give a brief report on the bulk third-party URI scheme registrations that Alexey
and I did, how well that worked, and what we might do next.

-Dave

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* briefly about registerProtocolHandler in HTML5 and its implication for
scheme registration
* about fragment identifiers and I18N (not discussed but alluded to in "Best
Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions"
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.html)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results,
and what additional testing is needed.
http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send
corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this
time around, at least briefly.
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with
http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: call for agenda items
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you
have definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to
discuss during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on
the kind of open issues that require WG interaction to move
forward), please post to this list in the next few days so that
Chris Weber and I can generate a draft agenda.
Thanks!
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlCEqpYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxclwCgosxu1CYeFHoGQqdNhszAz
DG/

es8An3TJaWI9Mb/jzJzadEHvdZSlzWsy
=+47t

Peter Saint-Andre

2012-10-23 13:25:12 UTC

Permalink

Thanks, all. We have a 90-minute session, so we'll have to see how much
time we can devote to each topic. Chris and I will send a proposed
agenda to this list in the next ~24 hours.

Post by Dave Thaler
I could give a brief report on the bulk third-party URI scheme registrations that Alexey
and I did, how well that worked, and what we might do next.
-Dave

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results,
and what additional testing is needed.
http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send
corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this
time around, at least briefly.
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with
http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: call for agenda items

There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you
have definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to
discuss during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on
the kind of open issues that require WG interaction to move
forward), please post to this list in the next few days so that
Chris Weber and I can generate a draft agenda.
Thanks!
Peter

Larry Masinter

2012-10-23 15:26:15 UTC

Permalink

Another possible agenda item for the IRI working group at IETF:

If anyone from the respective activities will be either at IETF or can call in, it would be great to hear what the plans are for http://url.spec.whatwg.org/ as the http://www.w3.org/2012/webapps/charter/ W3C WebApps working group charter for the "URL API". Liaison with IETF is listed there, but not the IRI working group, even though there's some coordination likely needed.

We might need to set up some jabber or audio conference, but it would be great to talk directly and not just emails and tweets.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:25 AM
To: Dave Thaler
Subject: Re: call for agenda items
Thanks, all. We have a 90-minute session, so we'll have to see how much
time we can devote to each topic. Chris and I will send a proposed
agenda to this list in the next ~24 hours.

Post by Dave Thaler
I could give a brief report on the bulk third-party URI scheme registrations that

Alexey

Post by Dave Thaler
and I did, how well that worked, and what we might do next.
-Dave

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results,
and what additional testing is needed.
http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send
corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this
time around, at least briefly.
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with
http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: call for agenda items

There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you
have definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to
discuss during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on
the kind of open issues that require WG interaction to move
forward), please post to this list in the next few days so that
Chris Weber and I can generate a d

Martin J. Dürst

2012-10-23 19:18:36 UTC

Permalink

Post by Dave Thaler
I could give a brief report on the bulk third-party URI scheme registrations that Alexey
and I did, how well that worked, and what we might do next.

Great to hear that that was successful. Although I think I'm subscribed
to all relevant mailing lists, I haven't seen any correspondence on
this. Do you have any pointer, or did all of that go on behind the
scenes (which would be okay with me, too).

Regards, Martin.

Post by Dave Thaler
-Dave

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results,
and what additional testing is needed.
http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send
corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this
time around, at least briefly.
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with
http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: call for agenda items
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you
have definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to
discuss during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on
the kind of open issues that require WG interaction to move
forward), please post to this list in the next few days so that
Chris Weber and I can generate a draft agenda.
Thanks!
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlCEqpYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxclwCgosxu1CYeFHoGQqdNhszAz
DG/

es8An3TJaWI9Mb/jzJzadEHvdZSlzWsy
=+47t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Dave Thaler

2012-10-23 19:21:56 UTC

Permalink

After the proposal was floated on this list first and there was support,
the rest happened behind the scenes. It all went mostly smoothly.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:19 PM
To: Dave Thaler
Subject: Bulk registration (Re: call for agenda items)

Post by Dave Thaler
I could give a brief report on the bulk third-party URI scheme
registrations that Alexey and I did, how well that worked, and what we

might do next.
Great to hear that that was successful. Although I think I'm subscribed to all
relevant mailing lists, I haven't seen any correspondence on this. Do you
have any pointer, or did all of that go on behind the scenes (which would be
okay with me, too).
Regards, Martin.

Post by Dave Thaler
-Dave

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* briefly about registerProtocolHandler in HTML5 and its implication
for scheme registration
* about fragment identifiers and I18N (not discussed but alluded to
in "Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions"
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.html)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: call for agenda items
* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test
results, and what additional testing is needed.
http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send
corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates
this time around, at least briefly.
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with
http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: call for agenda items
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you
have definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to
discuss during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on
the kind of open issues that require WG interaction to move
forward), please post to this list in the next few days so that
Chris Weber and I can generate a draft agenda.
Thanks!
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlCEqpYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxclwCgosxu1CYeFHoGQqdNhszAz

Post by Dave Thaler

DG/

es8An3TJaWI9Mb/jzJzadEHvdZSlzWsy
=+47t
-----END PGP SI

Julian Reschke

2012-10-24 10:21:17 UTC

Permalink

Post by Dave Thaler
After the proposal was floated on this list first and there was support,
the rest happened behind the scenes. It all went mostly smoothly.

So now we have a bunch of provisional registry entries that have no
explanation at all? I'm not sure that this makes the world any better :-)

Best regards, Julian

Bjoern Hoehrmann

2012-10-24 12:19:04 UTC

Permalink

Post by Julian Reschke
So now we have a bunch of provisional registry entries that have no
explanation at all? I'm not sure that this makes the world any better :-)

http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html links registration
details, e.g. <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/irc>.

--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:***@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

Julian Reschke

2012-10-24 12:32:19 UTC

Permalink

Post by Bjoern Hoehrmann

Post by Julian Reschke
So now we have a bunch of provisional registry entries that have no
explanation at all? I'm not sure that this makes the world any better :-)

http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html links registration
details, e.g. <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/irc>.

Indeed; I missed that because I assumed the links in the "Reference"
column would actually go somewhere useful.

Thanks, Julian

Martin J. Dürst

2012-10-23 18:46:48 UTC

Permalink

Post by Larry Masinter
* Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results, and what additional testing is needed. http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send corrections to me)
* Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this time around, at least briefly.

Yes. I'd also like to report on progress in the bidi area. I can do that
as part of talking about the bidi draft. One is that a student of mine
is making big progress on evaluating the interaction between separator
symbols and bidi, extending the work that Harald Alvestrand did for DNS
labels to IRIs. The second is that I'm currently at the Unicode
conference and talking to bidi experts, and may have some progress to
report from that.

Regards, Martin.

Post by Larry Masinter
* We should also talk about plans for convergence with http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)