Discussion:
Moved back to section about LEIRIs
Martin J. Dürst
2012-01-09 09:44:45 UTC
Permalink
Dear IRI experts,

Based on discussion at the (virtual) editorial meeting on Dec. 27/28,
and in line with our current direction to move out "HTML Preprocessing"
issues from RFC 3987bis to a separate spec at the W3C, I have replaced
the sections
Liberal Handling of Otherwise Invalid IRIs
and
Characters Disallowed or Not Recommended in IRIs
with the section that we had before working on "HTML Preprocessing"
issues, from draft-duerst-iri-bis-05.txt, entitled:
Legacy Extended IRI Syntax

Because we also have split the former section 3 into what's now section
3 and 4, I found it appropriate to submit a new version as -09. This is
now available at http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09.txt
and should be available at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09 in a few hours (the
tools server is usually a bit behind the main server).

You can look at the differences between -08 and -09 at
http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-08.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09.txt
(you may have to piece that back together if some mail software
(possibly on my end) chopped it up).

What I did on LEIRIs was strictly only bringing back to old text. We
still have to go through the diffs again and decide which of the text
changes between draft-duerst-iri-bis-05 and draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-08
are due to the introduction of "HTML Preprocessing" into the draft, and
which ones are independent of this. Also, we have to check the issues
that were raised against the text in -08 and before and check how much
of it still needs editing action.

Regards, Martin.
Martin J. Dürst
2012-01-09 09:50:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Martin J. Dürst
You can look at the differences between -08 and -09 at
http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-08.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09.txt
(you may have to piece that back together if some mail software
(possibly on my end) chopped it up).
Actually, this may be easier:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09.txt

Regards, Martin.

Loading...