[iri] #112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

[iri issue tracker]

#112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

RFC 3986 on URIs contains the "ladder" for comparison which was the source
of iri-comparison. The iri-comparison document makes mainly editorial but
perhaps normative definitions for comparison which might supercede, so
perhaps iri-comparison should 'UPDATE' 3986.
Opinions?
--
------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: masinter@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-comparison@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: comparison | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/112>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

[iri issue tracker]

#112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison


Comment (by masinter@…):

Alternatively? Consider making this document BCP rather than standards
track, since it basically gives guidance for protocols and applications
needing equivalence, and doesn't directly have a scope of application?
(I'm putting this comment in for completeness since it was in iri-
comparison, but I don't think this is such a great idea ...)
--
------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: masinter@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-comparison@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: comparison | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------+------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/112#comment:1>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

[iri issue tracker]

#112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

Changes (by masinter@…):

* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed


Comment:

draft-ietf-iri-comparison now says it "updates" 3986.
--
------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: masinter@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-comparison@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: comparison | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
------------------------+------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/112#comment:2>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>