[iri] #125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only

[iri issue tracker]

#125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only

Scheme specifications/registrations seem to have difficulties
understanding that #fragment is independent of a scheme specification.
This may need to be clarified.

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0000.html and
the followup messages in the thread. A specific wording proposal is at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0004.html.
--
----------------------+-----------------
Reporter: duerst@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: 4395bis | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
----------------------+-----------------

Ticket URL: <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/125>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Post by iri issue tracker
#125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only
Scheme specifications/registrations seem to have difficulties
understanding that #fragment is independent of a scheme specification.
This may need to be clarified.
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0000.html and
the followup messages in the thread. A specific wording proposal is at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0004.html.

Martin, what is the relationship between this ticket and #126?

Peter