Discussion:
[iri] #70: RFC 2119 language in Section 3.1 of 4395bis
iri issue tracker
2011-12-14 00:35:44 UTC
Permalink
#70: RFC 2119 language in Section 3.1 of 4395bis

Changes (by masinter@…):

* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed


Comment:

Based on the discussion at IETF82, the following changes


< is costly; some parts of URI/IRI processing may be scheme-
dependent,
---
may be costly; some parts of URI/IRI processing may be scheme-
dependent,


207,209c207,211
< New URI/IRI schemes SHOULD have clear utility to the broad
< Internet community, beyond that available with already
registered URI/IRI
< schemes.
---
New schemes should have utility to the
Internet community beyond that available with already
registered
schemes. The registration document SHOULD discuss the utility
of the scheme being registered.
--
-------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: evnikita2@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: 4395bis | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
-------------------------+---------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/70#comment:4>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Loading...