iri issue tracker
2012-10-20 04:59:34 UTC
#133: What to do about query part in URI->IRI mapping
Draft -12 does not mention the special case of the query part in URI->IRI
mapping. I have put in some text (to appear in new draft) that optionally
allows percent-escaping to remain in the query part for http:/https:.
Do we need more details for this optionality? Should this be mandatory?
I personally don't want it to be mandatory because in the future, when
(almost) everything is UTF-8, unescaping will just be fine.
--
----------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: duerst@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: 3987bis | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
----------------------+--------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/133>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Draft -12 does not mention the special case of the query part in URI->IRI
mapping. I have put in some text (to appear in new draft) that optionally
allows percent-escaping to remain in the query part for http:/https:.
Do we need more details for this optionality? Should this be mandatory?
I personally don't want it to be mandatory because in the future, when
(almost) everything is UTF-8, unescaping will just be fine.
--
----------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: duerst@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: 3987bis | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
----------------------+--------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/133>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>